Monday 23 July 2007

Setting up the Targets - by David Hamilton

American philosopher George Santayana remarked that those who do not learn from history are destined to repeat its mistakes. On October the 26th is the anniversary of a unique event in England –a bomb attack on an mp’s home in 1965. This is a lesson that de-humanising a politician could have fatal consequences as happened to Pym Fortuyn and Theo Van Gogh.

Mr.Griffiths had been Member of Parliament for Smethwick (now Warley) for just a year. He had been leader of the Conservative group on the council and won the election of 15th October 1964 against a national swing to Labour, which was led by Harold Wilson. The defeated MP Patrick Gordon Walker was Foreign Secretary designate and a personal friend of Wilson. Mr.Griffith’s turned Walker’s 3,544 majority into 1,774 for the Conservatives. Alderman Griffiths was local-born and headmaster of nearby primary school, Fir Tree Lane. Mr.Walker lived in Hamstead Garden Suburb. Peter Griffiths lost his seat in March 1966 to Andrew Faulds (Labour) who lived in Stratford –upon-Avon!

Biased and exaggerated reporting created a dangerous climate in which Mr.Griffiths ceased to be seen as human and became a “racialist”, something to be reviled. When people are thus de-humanised they become just figures of hate it does not matter what others do to them. Paul Foot wrote a book on this “Immigration and Race in British Politics” and, though an excellent journalist, he could not overcome his prejudice to give Mr. Griffiths a fair examination.

However, he did note Walker’s hypocrisy and commented, ”The racial bitterness stirred up…could well last for a generation. For this Patrick Gordon Walker must take his share of the responsibility.” He quoted a Birmingham mp, “look at Patrick. He never left the subject alone.”(1) Walker had issued different election leaflets for each ethnic group. While he was preaching against race discrimination, Smethwick Labour club operated a colour bar!

Mr.Griffiths told the Birmingham Evening Mail, on 24/9/1964, “The Socialists are attempting to obtain the coloured vote because they think it will hold Smethwick for them.”

Many current attitudes were pre-figured in this election. The recent suggestion by Trevor Philips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality, has suggested young Black boys need schooling separately. This is similar to a suggestion by Peter Griffiths in February 1964, when in response to complaints from white parents he proposed to hold special classes for Indian children who could not speak English for three hours a day. They were to be taught by their own teachers in English, maths and science and then rejoin the others for games and crafts. He was accused of trying to start Apartheid in local schools!

Some think the oppression and social engineering began with Political Correctness or the advent of New Labour under Blair, but in fact it is part of the Multi-Racialists’ mentality. A couple of examples: The first act of positive discrimination was in 1950 when Minister of Food John Strachey(L) announced that no Government contracts would go to caterers who did not employ coloured people. In 1955 Smethwick a Conservative candidate for the council Harold had his election addresses printed in Urdu as well as English as did Conservative General election candidate John Wells did too.. In 1964 Enid Blyton was under attack for her book "The Little Black Doll". Also in 1964 the Campaign Against Racial Discrimination sent out forms for general election candidates to sign pledging not to us race as an issue and in 3 constituencies all the candidates agreed not to mention race!

Meanwhile, back at the narrative – An offensive slogan was being posted on walls before and during the election,” If you want a N***** for a neighbour, vote Labour”. Harold Wilson attributed this to Griffiths on national Television, when asked by Robin Day on Panorama of 9th March. Mr. Wilson replied, that he understood that this was said by the Conservative candidate in Smethwick. Griffiths denied he or any member of the Conservative party had used this slogan, but did refuse to condemn its use saying it was an expression of frustration felt by local people. He explained that the only person who had heard it was Mr.Walker, who claimed it was in use in the Municipal elections of 1963. A Labour spokesman said that Wilson had said no more than was in the morning’s Times. Mr.Griffiths threatened to sue Mr.Wilson but later declined.

After the Election new Prime Minister Wilson broke from his address on the Queens speech to insult Griffiths by calling him a “Parliamentary Leper”, who would be shunned by everyone in the House. This breached the convention that new members be protected until after their Maiden speech! Harold Gurden Birmingham Conservative mp (Selly Oak) told the Times 25/1/1965, “He “had not met Griffiths but would be his friend in the House.”

Then on October the 5th 1964 just two weeks before polling Griffiths was denounced for his campaign in the Birmingham Post and the Times Midland correspondent wrote, ”It is abhorrent to all Conservatives candidates and officials of stature to whom I have talked.” He headed his column of the 12th, “Vile –its all in Black and White.”

As the election result was announced on October the 16th Socialists made Nazi salutes. Mr.Walker, the embittered loser griped,” I feel the result tonight will give Smethwick a bad name.” The Bishop of Southwark called the electorate “unchristian” and the Bishop of Chelmsford and Archbishop of Canterbury were critical. Local people supporting a local-born candidate in a democratic election over a local issue is a model of Democracy at work yet, these un-elected Bishops who lived far away, were imposing their a priori ideology on the situation but not drawing inferences from the facts or observation.

The way to understand this piece of history is not through the prejudices of outsiders but through real examples: A supporter of Mr.Griffith’s campaign was Cllr. Alan Vernon, 23-years old, who had fostered a young coloured child. Mr.Vernon, who had supported Griffiths campaign, told the Times of 15th February 1965, June, “I do not think the campaign was conducted on racialist lines. I feel that immigration should be restricted. He had also fostered a young coloured child eighteen months previously. He supported the Marshall Street plan.

This plan was an attempt by the Conservative council to buy the remaining houses in Marshall Street to sell to white people as 40% were occupied by coloureds people. Martin Luther King himself had addressed members of Parliament in December 1964 on his way to Oslo to collect his Noble Peace Prize and had warned of the creation of “Little Harlems”.(2) Conservative group leaders had taken the decision after meeting a delegation of worried housewives. Housing Committee chairman E. Gould remarked,” This is not colour prejudice. We understand that over thirty houses in Marshall Street are occupied by coloured people and we think they should not be allowed to occupy more than half the houses in any street.” Griffiths agreed and told the Times of 7th December, 1964 ” coloured people can only be integrated if they live alongside white people.”

Later a delegation of housewives visited Richard Crossman Minister of Housing for support, who with his PPS Bob Mellish treated them harshly and upset the ladies. A request for funding was sent but turned down. Crossman a leading left-wing intellectual was proud of having opposed the 1961 Commonwealth Immigration Bill, as a “shameful piece of legislation, but wrote in his Diary,
“Ever since the Smethwick election it has been quite clear that immigration can be the greatest potential vote loser for the Labour party if we are seen to be permitting a flood of immigrants to come and blight the central areas of our cities.”(3)

Mellish had said “Smethwick’s name stinks and “Smethwick is well regarded in Alabama.” But in May 1976 with an influx of Malawi Asians into his own Bermondsey constituency, Mr. Mellish, then Labours’ chief whip, told the Commons, “With 53 million of us we cannot go on without strict immigration control.”

Ever consistent the BBC took Malcolm X the American Black Power leader to Marshall Street in February 1965 to film for their current affairs programme “Tonight”. He told the world’s media,” I have come here because I am disturbed by reports that coloured people in Smethwick are being badly treated. I have heard they are being treated as the Jews under Hitler. I would not wait for the Fascist element in Smethwick to erect gas ovens.” I wonder who he heard that off! He told the London Times that the BBC had taken him there for a programme on race in their current affairs programe “Tonight”. This was a mere nine days before he was assassinated after his return to the States.

The BBC denied having brought him but Smethwick’s eloquent mayor Alderman C.V.Williamse investigated and revealed, that he was appalled at” the BBC bringing algebraic characters to Smethwick and then denying it. I was most amazed at the finesse displayed when I spoke of him being brought in a BBC car. I was told the car was not a BBC car but it was owned by one of the directors.” Griffiths was outraged by the visitations of extremists and wrote to the “Smegs” Telephone, “ The visit of Malcolm X was an affront to decent people and a direct provocation. That he should have been brought to Marshall Street by the BBC, which is supposed to be a responsible public corporation, makes matters worse. I say to all extremists Right and Left, black or white, get out and stay out.” A blazing wooden cross had been left against a door in Pink Passage, with KKK painted on the pavement. The front room was a store for an Indian shopkeeper. Earlier a Labour Councillor described the council as being like “Peter Griffiths’ Reichstag.”

Mr.Griffiths also called for health checks on immigrants when he responded to a question in the local paper the “Smethwick Telephone”, “Immigration should be limited to those of sound health who have jobs and living accommodation arranged before they enter.” This was prescient as there was an outbreak of Typhoid in Smethwick in April 1965. Dr.John Briant the Deputy Medical Officer of Health said ”Smethwick had contained one outbreak but another might occur if people were let into the country without health checks.”
That campaign of vilification which lasted for eighteen months and had been featured in media all across the world, culminated in a time bomb being planted outside Peter Griffith’s home. This is unique in British politics. The bomb was a battery and clock placed on a meter cover, connected by wires through the letterbox to a detonator and an explosive substance. The explosion splintered part of the front door, blew the dining room door off its hinges, broke the hinges on an upstairs door, blew off the loft entrance, smashed some windows and drove splinters into the walls and stair banisters in the hall. The police thought it the work of experts. The media created a climate in which Peter Griffiths was made a legitimate target for political fanatics. This shows that irresponsible journalists and politicians can put people’s lives in danger especially now we have many Muslim extremists in the country, if they use wild and emotive terms of abuse based on lies against an opponent.

(1955)

1 Foot, Paul 1965. Immigration and Race in British Politics (Penguin)

2 Griffiths, Peter 1966. A Question of Colour (Leslie Frewin)

3 Crossman Richard1975. Diaries of a Cabinet Minister. Vol.1

David Hamilton

Friday 13 July 2007

THE REALISTIC ALLIANCE - DAVID HAMILTON

Britain has thwarted several terror plots, including a scheme by a British Muslim to blow up the New York Stock Exchange and other landmarks, and a plan by Muslim extremists to use liquid explosives to blow up as many as 10 flights between the United States and Britain but will not always succeed. In December 2006 Home Secretary John Reid revealed there were thirty investigations into Muslim conspiracies to plant bombs and murder innocent people under way.

There is supposed to be 1.5 million Muslims in Britain, which is a great underestimate, and 300 Muslims in the military which makes them traitors to their people. There is the largest population of Pakistani immigrants anywhere, many of whom complain of anti-Muslim bias. Militant opposition to us is growing among younger, second-generation Muslims, which has been galvanised by Blair’s illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.

In a poll published by the Daily Telegraph 40 percent of young Muslims said they would prefer to live under Islamic law in Britain. One in eight said they admired groups such as al-Qaida that are”prepared to fight the West.”

As a “Nationalist” I believe that each people and each country is responsible for their own affairs and their own destiny. How people go on in Afghanistan and Iraq is their business and nothing to do with us. Intellectually, the reasoning that leads to poking in other people’s affairs and justifying it with pious terms is universal thinking. A Nationalist or Conservative would be concerned with his own people and their needs. Under the surface the war on Iraq does have possible motivation like keeping Israel safe and ensuring oil supplies. But it lacks practical wisdom.

I ask you gentle reader, sit and contemplate the folly of bringing people of a different religion and with communal aspirations different from ours into our communities then bombing their women and children in their own countries! This tells them that we are their enemies. It is only 80 years since Churchill sent the British to bomb their villages with bi-planes. These latest attacks show us to be waging constant war against them. These events fit into and help create a world view in which we are the enemies of a rival religion and a different type of people. That difference manifests in the way Muslims here do not like us or our ways and want to change them to something more suitable to them. We have nothing in common. Sharia law is now being operated in many of our cities.

Our Government ministers pretend it is not so and that if we are nice to them they will be nice to us. Unlike Conservatives they ignore the historical grudge that Muslims have for us even while their attacks on Muslim states re-kindle those grudges. We cannot just transcend history to make the world nice. Our Government have thus compromised the safety of our people and are sneaking immigrants in and convincing themselves that they are essentially good and if we give them everything and appeal to their goodwill then we will all get on nicely together.

The catalyst of the Muslim bombings in London is the invasion of Iraq. The originating reason is that Muslims here do not like us or our ways and want to change them to something more suitable to them. Our Government ministers have compromised the safety of the public and sneaking immigrants in many of whom are potential terrorists. The Sunday Times of March 28, 2004 reported that former immigration minister Beverley Hughes personally authorised a policy to allow tens of thousands of migrants into Britain without adequate checks, according to a leaked Home Office document. She was first cleared by an internal inquiry into the “fast-tracking” of immigrants then new evidence showed the minister approved far more than she admitted.

British-based terrorists have carried out operations in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kenya, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Israel, Morocco, Russia, Spain, and America. Many governments - Jordanian, Egyptian, Moroccan, Spanish, French, and American - have protested London's refusal to shut down its Islamist terrorist infrastructure or extradite wanted operatives. Muslim community shelters extremists and illegal immigrants. The reason they are attacking us is because we and Jews are their enemies. They were treated as impoverished, lacking opportunities and enraged by direct Israeli action on their communities.

In practice Palestinian mores glorifies suicide bombers as ' shahid ' or martyrs and terrorism is part of the Palestinian mentality. In Britain they are bombers because of Ideology not social conditions and many young Muslims hero worship them. The extremists are not poor Muslims suffering racism or poverty but middle class, Muslims born and educated in Britain who regard us as their enemies based on the ideology of hatred they have been taught in the mosques on our streets. This is an “enemy within”, that does not have to invade because it was imported by our elites who pour tax payers money into their communities, such as Bradford, Burnley, Oldham and Keighley.

On 27 7 2005 BBC reporter Phil Mackie admitted on Radio 5 Brian Hayes 10 pm programme that the BBC censors the truth about Muslims because the BBC was selective in its broadcasting of Muslim statements. A Totalitatian law against Religious hatred has been introduced at the behest of Muslim leaders This is an Act of Appeasement to butter-up one faction in the breakdown into a chaos of competing tribes which is Multi-Racial Britain. I wonder if this analysis of the imminent racial war in Britain is classifiable as “inciting racial hatred”. If so I am liable to seven years in prison.

There is an alliance between Socialist-Totalitarians and Muslims. Members of this Labour-Islam axis used taxpayers' money to help finance the London suicide bombers. Labour-run Leeds City Council gave more than £125,000 to premises and projects used by the Edgware Road bomber to recruit and train his terror cell. The money was spent on building work and equipment at two Leeds properties used by the bombers, as well as on Al Qaeda away-days, including the whitewater-rafting trip used as the final 'bonding' activity for the bombers just before they planted the bombs. Edgware Road bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan received massive funding for four Leeds-based Muslim youth groups. He got £106,000 for the Leeds Community school, based in Beeston, where some of the bombs were made. The secrecy he needed for such activities was guaranteed by a council grant of £1,582 ”to improve security at the premises.

Khan also raked in grants for the Iqra Learning Centre, a Muslim bookshop which distributed videos glorifying suicide bombers, and £16,000 for equipment for a Muslim boys only gym in the basement of a mosque in Hardy Street, Beeston, where he recruited two of the other 7/7 murderers, Shehzad Tanweer and Hassib Hussain. The gang went on away-day trips paid for by a £1,535 grant to the Youth Support Service to take Muslim youths on sporting activities and educational trips.

It is not just a few extremists funded by taxpayers' money from Islamophile Labour councillors. At Shehzad Tanweer's memorial funeral in his home village in Pakistan, an estimated 10,000 mourners chanted Jihad, Jihad, Jihad and eulogised the suicide bomber. Such feelings, of course, are kept under wraps in Britain, but the truth that emerged revealed how much support for murder attacks on us exists across Muslim states.

Pakistan is one of the countries where our Government has been recruiting immigrants. In November 2006 it was reported that the Government were advertising for immigrants to come here from terrorist countries. A Foreign Office pamphlet declares: 'Multicultural Britain - a Land of Immigrants'. It encouraged immigrants to move telling them of the preferential treatment they get under the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. The Foreign Office put it in embassies across the world. It was discovered in Pakistan.

Blair was personally committed to the intervention in Kosovo to help the Muslims against the Serbs. Likewise, our Government funded the reconstruction of Bosnia. Tony Blair personally champions the entry of Turkey a Muslim country into the EU. A major policy promoted by the Chancellor, Gordon Brown has been development aid, with 33 of the countries receiving British foreign aid being Muslim. Since 1997, the British aid assistance to Bangladesh alone has doubled.. This shows the real nature of foreign aid: transferring our money to the foreign elites and political causes supported by our elites. Within weeks of coming to power Labour repealed the Primary Purpose Rule that stopped people bringing their families here from Pakistan, Bangladesh and other Muslim countries.

Second to racial attacks on whites by blacks is the number of racial attacks by Muslims on Jewish people. Tony Blair and the other elites are creating a potential holocaust against Jewish people here on British soil at the hands of the Muslim extremists they are importing from states that hate Israel and by extension Jews, and then granting them citizenship . There are Muslim shops all over the UK selling” The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”. Our Government has introduced against “Religious hatred” that carries seven-years imprisonment which will indirectly protect terrorists.

Many of our authorities encourage terrorism. Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London, was quoted in the Sun of Thursday, July 8, 2004 defending a Muslim cleric who supported suicide bombings and for child suicide bombings, executing homosexuals, and wife beating and killing Jews. Mayor Livingston called the sheik an honoured guest. He added that the outcry in the tabloid press shows why legislation is necessary (to prevent religious hatred). Egyptian-born al- Qaradawi said he had been visiting London for 30 years and was baffled by the fuss. In a pre-recorded TV interview, the cleric called for suicide bombers to kill Allied soldiers in Iraq. In London he spoke in support of suicide bombings by Palestinians in Israel. On BBC2's News Night he urged Iraqis to rise against Coalition forces. If they failed, he said, suicide bombers should be used against them.”

In November 2001 mayor Livingstone said that British Muslims fought for the Taliban in Afghanistan should not be prosecuted for treason if they return to this country. In an interview with The Telegraph the London mayor called on the police to be lenient. We've got to accept that these people went off because of a deep sense of injustice about what's happening in Israel and the West Bank” The West should understand that they and the al-Qa'eda network feed off a genuine injustice in the Middle East. Mayor Livingston invited back cleric Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi who described Palestinian suicide bombers in Israel as martyrs. The Crown Prosecution Service said there was not enough evidence to prosecute him on the grounds of his speeches. Mr Livingstone apologised to his guest and called the criticism “hysteria.”

Livingston’s remarks to a Jewish journalist being like a concentration camp guard are an indication. Commenting on Israel Cherie Blair stated She “...understands how people are driven to suicide bombing” This gives encouragement to extremists here too because they identify with the terrorists or “freedom fighters” in Muslim countries. For making general comments on Arabs the BBC sacked Robert Kilroy-Silk, yet, signed the former editor-in-chief of Al-Jazeera.

During the run-up the the General Election of 2005 the Labour party issued posters of pigs flying with the faces of Michael Howard and Oliver Letwin who are both Jewish superimposed, but dropped them after protests. In an openly anti-semetic plea to the Muslim community to support labour, Government minister Mike O'Brien wrote in Muslim World, in early 2005, that “The government has obediently introduced controversial legislation (The law against religous hatred) at the behest of Muslim leaders. The article also implies that Muslims should not vote for Michael Howard because he is Jewish.
O’Brien boasted, ”When the Americans and Israelis refused to negotiate with Yasser Arafat, Tony Blair promptly sent myself as the Foreign Office Minister, to visit Yasser Arafat in the Muquata in Ramallah to convey the message that we had not abandoned him. Tony Blair’s message was clear: we will work with the elected leader of the Palestinians, even if the Americans will not. On the issue of the assassination of the leaders of Hamas, Jack Straw as the Foreign Secretary was the first Western politician to condemn Israel’s actions.”

In November 2003, the European Union's “Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia” suppressed a report on the rise of anti-Semitism. The survey had found that "many anti-Semitic incidents were carried out by Muslim and pro-Palestinian groups," and so a "political decision" was taken not to publish it because of "fears that it would increase hostility towards Muslims."

Men who fought for the Taliban against our soldiers have been granted asylum, Algerian terrorists have flooded in and countless Iraqi's probably trained and of active age (18-35) have also been admitted as asylum seekers. Over 3000 Al-Qaeda terrorists trained in Afghanistan are living here and more enter from Iraq every day. There are terror cells right across Britain as shown by the locations of police raids following the bombings.

The July 7th terrorist attacks and the failed suicide bombings two weeks later, the riots here and in France in 2000 are part of a religous war against the West and Jewish people. The terrorists have no central chain of command but instead operate by a unified methodology of terror by using the same techniques of terrorism, they enter countries by immigration and co-ordinate the war for Global Jihad over the internet, through media and supporters in mosques. These Wahhabist hate us yet their greatest allies the liberal-left who, while Muslims prepare for war against us all, are surrendering us to them.

The corollary of this nationalist Conservative concern with keeping our territory for our own people and of course the realistic assessment of human nature and how our thoughtless behaviour can make us enemies is not to butt into the affairs of other countries but respect their sovereignty, their legitimate dominion over their territory that, like ours, is sanctioned by time and emotional bonding with the territory. On this basis we should work for two independent sovereign states in Palestine and Israel and whether we like the UN or not it is there and we could do it through that or through American politics.
There is such an abandonment of belief in one’s own country, culture and history amongst western elites that thee cannot comprehend that Arabs who share our common humanity have these instincts abstract systems of ideology that having 3 disparate and mutually disliking ethnic groups in Iraq each with a need for their own territory, culture and religous beliefs is incomprehensible to them. They are so ashamed of our history that they fail to learn from it. If they considered, to take just one example, the troubles the British Empire caused by introducing Tamils into Indonesia to work on the rubber plantations they might get a glimmer of reality.

As it is things are likely to worsen. Writing in the Guardian of 22 March Geoffrey Wheatcroft told of power of “Anglo neoconservatives” in the British Conservative party. “Several of the younger M.P.’s are fanatical adherents of the creed with its three prongs: ardent support for the Iraq war, for the U.S. and for Israel.” The mutual incomprehension can be seen in the recent knighting of Salaman Rushdie whose book “Satanic Verses” was so insulting to Muslims in the early 80’s is now seen as an insult to them by our Queen. Then we have Tony Blair, who despite his support for Muslim causes in the UK,is widely regarded as a war criminal abroad because of his part in the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, made “Middle East Peace Envoy!” This bizarre appointment will look to the Arabs as another western provocation, another insult to Islam. It is another example of how western rulers have lost touch with reality and long ago forsook practical wisdom based on common sense and a shrew judgement of human nature; for abstract reason, universal ideas and the belief that persons are mallable and can be changed to suit a pre – conceived plan.

We have British born suicide bombers operating in Israel and Iraq. Fanatics, potential terrorists and ordinary Muslims know they are getting favourtism from British authorities and this encourages terrorists to unite and plan bomb attacks on us. It is an alliance of Socialist-Totalitarians and Muslim extremists against “whites” and Jewish people. Many Jewish people in France support the Front Nationale as it is seen as their only protection from a Muslim jihad. And in Antwerp the Vlaams Belang and the Jewish community united against Islamification.

It is not unfair to say that the Neo Cons have brought a lot of this danger onto Jewish people but we must not lump them all together any more than Jewish people should lump all us together as potential Nazis. As a self-conscious Englishmen with Welsh ancestory and a Christian, or, as I like to call myself an “Anglo” or “Anglo-Saxon Celt”, I believe the practical wisdom is that we must offer the Jewish community protection against this Alliance of Socialist Totalitarians and the Muslim extremists they are bringing here, funding and protecting by law.

As things stand both peoples face the greatest holocaust in human history as the much of the Muslim world hates us and is turning on us. Neither of our peoples have anywhere to run for Israel is surrounded and traitorous western rulers are importing them into our communities. Our only solution is to form a realistic alliance of Jews and Gentiles to defend our two peoples who are the intended targets of the alliance.

Tuesday 10 July 2007

CDA NEEDS YOU!

The CDA goes from strength to strength. We are now the leading voice of the radical Tory right in Britain. We oppose the social liberal betrayal of our party. We oppose the infiltration of the "modernisers". We want real opposition to Blair. WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK.

The CDA has held prominent national events - including a much-reported Tory conference rally, and our Spring Conference and policy forum. We deployed a big force during the Countryside March, and our supporters bombard newspapers with letters and press releases. Hundreds have attended our meetings - and thousands have contributed to our website debates.Our activists work throughout the country to oppose the betrayal of British conservatism.

Our advertisements in the press are seen by thousands of people. The CDA has arrived - and we will not be bullied, or silenced!But our campaigns - on the EU, asylum, regaining our freedom, fighting the Blairite PC police state, defending rural Britain - cost money.

We need to keep the momentum going, to keep our movement strong! Now, we are moving up a gear, with plans for some very big and spectacular campaigns. More will be revealed in due course, but in the meantime, YOU can get us to the all-important "Stage 2".

Our national appeal will enable the CDA to move forward and fight for you. Do you want to see a real Tory opposition in Britain? Do you want to hear the voice of patriotism loud and clear, instead of evil political correctness? Do you long for the nation we had - do you long to give your children a Britain to be proud of? Then help the CDA!

Please - for the sake of the cause, send your donations to:

The CDA National Patriotic Appeal,
BCM 9045,
London
WC1N 3X X

Please make all cheques payable to: The Conservative Democratic Alliance.

VISIT OUR QUICKTOPIC FORUM AT:

http://www.quicktopic.com/share?s=UuZb

Welcome

We are currently working on this blog and will soon have a variety of articles for you to comment upon

About Me

Mike Smith, is Chairman of the Conservative Democratic Alliance (CDA). He was formerly on the Executive Council of the Conservative Monday Club. He is a Chartered Surveyor. Distinguished members of Mr Keith-Smith's family include James Keith, the legendary Prussian Field-Marshal, and his brother George Keith, hereditary Earl Marischal of Scotland and friend of Frederick the Great. Through his paternal grandmother he is descended from Frederick Philipse, Dutch-born merchant of New Amsterdam. Distinguished members of the family who subsequently made their life in England included General Sir Frederick Philipse Robinson. Smith was a member of the Conservative Party for 32 years, attaining area rank and serving for several years as Vice-Chairman of Portsmouth South Conservatives. In 2002 he was expelled from the party for attacking Iain Duncan Smith in print. Challenging this unlawful expulsion with a writ, he was readmitted and his costs paid by Central Office. In the 2005 General Election he stood as the UKIP candidate for Portsmouth North. Smith recently won a major test case for libel over the internet against a former schoolteacher.